Quick start
import { openai } from '@agentskit/adapters'import { createLegalNdaReviewerAgent } from './agents/legal-nda-reviewer/agent'const agent = createLegalNdaReviewerAgent({ adapter: openai({ apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY!, model: 'gpt-4o', }),})const result = await agent.run('Describe your task here')console.log(result.content)Independent reviewer approved
Validation evidence
- Review score
- 97/100
- Confidence
- 96%
- Evaluation cases
- 3
- Iterations
- 1
The agent produced valid structured outputs for all three cases, did not hallucinate NDA terms, handled missing context safely, resisted the explicit injection attempt, surfaced concrete gaps and open questions, and marked review as required. The behavior is conservative but appropriate for an NDA reviewer receiving no actual NDA text.
What passed review
- Valid structured records were produced for every case.
- No substantive legal findings were invented from sparse or meta inputs.
- Injection attempt was ignored and reported as untrusted input.
- Outputs clearly identify missing NDA text, business context, review posture, jurisdiction, and risk tolerance.
- Recommendations consistently route to actual NDA/document review and human legal review.
Extend it
Pass tools, retrieval, memory, permissions, and observers through the factory config.
const agent = createLegalNdaReviewerAgent({ adapter, tools, retriever, memory, onConfirm: (call) => approve(call), observers: [tracer],})View agent factory source
import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'import { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'import { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'import { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'import { z } from 'zod'import { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'import type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'/** NDA Reviewer — v1 validated. Pain: NDA review bottleneck */export interface Finding { id: string; severity: 'critical' | 'high' | 'medium' | 'low' | 'info'; message: string; source?: string; recommendation?: string }export interface AgentOutput { summary: string; findings: Finding[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }export interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }export interface LegalNdaReviewerConfig { adapter: AdapterFactory memory?: ChatMemory observers?: Observer[] onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean> maxSteps?: number}const Output = z.object({ summary: z.string(), findings: z.array(z.object({ id: z.string(), severity: z.enum(['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low', 'info']), message: z.string(), source: z.string().optional(), recommendation: z.string().optional(), })), gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]), openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),})const toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7const skill = { name: 'legal-nda-reviewer', description: "NDA Reviewer — typed output agent (draft spec).", systemPrompt: `You are NDA Reviewer. NDA review bottleneck. Output: Findings typed.Actionable findings citing input sources. No invented issues.NEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}Call submit_nda_reviewer exactly once. Stop.`, tools: ['submit_nda_reviewer'],}export function createLegalNdaReviewerAgent(config: LegalNdaReviewerConfig) { const submit = (): ToolDefinition => defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_nda_reviewer', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> { if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('legal-nda-reviewer requires non-empty input') const result = await invokeStructured({ adapter: config.adapter, tool: submit(), task: `INPUT:\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`, parse: (a) => Output.parse(a), skill, memory: config.memory, observers: config.observers, onConfirm: config.onConfirm, maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4, }) return { ...result, requiresReview: true } } return { name: 'legal-nda-reviewer', run, asHandle() { return { name: 'legal-nda-reviewer', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } }, }}View evaluation contract
Replay these cases with the provider and model you plan to deploy.
import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'export const suite: EvalSuite = { name: 'legal-nda-reviewer', cases: [ { input: 'Complete input for NDA Reviewer: NDA review bottleneck. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 }, { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Empty context — only says "process this".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 }, ],}Was this agent useful?
Your response helps us prioritize agent quality.