{"id":"legal-nda-reviewer","title":"NDA Reviewer","description":"Findings typed. NDA review bottleneck. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","category":"legal","status":"validated","version":"1.0.0","source":"agentskit-registry","license":"MIT","tags":["legal","structured-output","v1"],"packages":["@agentskit/core","@agentskit/runtime","@agentskit/tools"],"files":["agent.ts","README.md","eval.ts"],"requires":{"zod":"^3","zod-to-json-schema":"^3"},"skill":{"name":"legal-nda-reviewer","description":"Findings typed. NDA review bottleneck. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","systemPrompt":"You are NDA Reviewer. NDA review bottleneck. Output: Findings typed.\nActionable findings citing input sources. No invented issues.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_nda_reviewer exactly once. Stop."},"flow":null,"a2a":{"id":"io.agentskit.registry.legal-nda-reviewer","name":"NDA Reviewer","description":"Findings typed. NDA review bottleneck. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","version":"1.0.0","homepage":"https://registry.agentskit.io","skills":[{"name":"legal-nda-reviewer","description":"Findings typed. NDA review bottleneck. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","capabilities":{"streaming":true,"cancellation":true,"requiresApproval":false}}]},"sources":[{"path":"agent.ts","content":"import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'\nimport { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'\nimport { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'\nimport { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'\nimport { z } from 'zod'\nimport { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'\nimport type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'\n\n/** NDA Reviewer — v1 validated. Pain: NDA review bottleneck */\n\nexport interface Finding { id: string; severity: 'critical' | 'high' | 'medium' | 'low' | 'info'; message: string; source?: string; recommendation?: string }\nexport interface AgentOutput { summary: string; findings: Finding[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }\nexport interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }\nexport interface LegalNdaReviewerConfig {\n  adapter: AdapterFactory\n  memory?: ChatMemory\n  observers?: Observer[]\n  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>\n  maxSteps?: number\n}\n\nconst Output = z.object({\n  summary: z.string(),\n  findings: z.array(z.object({\n    id: z.string(), severity: z.enum(['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low', 'info']),\n    message: z.string(), source: z.string().optional(), recommendation: z.string().optional(),\n  })),\n  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n})\nconst toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7\n\nconst skill = {\n  name: 'legal-nda-reviewer',\n  description: \"NDA Reviewer — typed output agent (draft spec).\",\n  systemPrompt: `You are NDA Reviewer. NDA review bottleneck. Output: Findings typed.\nActionable findings citing input sources. No invented issues.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_nda_reviewer exactly once. Stop.`,\n  tools: ['submit_nda_reviewer'],\n}\n\nexport function createLegalNdaReviewerAgent(config: LegalNdaReviewerConfig) {\n  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>\n    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_nda_reviewer', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition\n\n  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {\n    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('legal-nda-reviewer requires non-empty input')\n    const result = await invokeStructured({\n      adapter: config.adapter,\n      tool: submit(),\n      task: `INPUT:\\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,\n      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),\n      skill,\n      memory: config.memory,\n      observers: config.observers,\n      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,\n      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,\n    })\n    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }\n  }\n  return {\n    name: 'legal-nda-reviewer',\n    run,\n    asHandle() { return { name: 'legal-nda-reviewer', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },\n  }\n}\n"},{"path":"README.md","content":"# NDA Reviewer\n\n> **v1 validated** — `npx agentskit add legal-nda-reviewer`\n\n## Pain\nNDA review bottleneck\n\n## Output\nFindings typed\n"},{"path":"eval.ts","content":"import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'\n\nexport const suite: EvalSuite = {\n  name: 'legal-nda-reviewer',\n  cases: [\n    { input: 'Complete input for NDA Reviewer: NDA review bottleneck. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },\n    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Empty context — only says \"process this\".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },\n  ],\n}\n"}],"installable":true,"validation":{"status":"approved","score":97,"confidence":0.96,"method":"codex-executor-independent-reviewer","iterations":1,"cases":3,"summary":"The agent produced valid structured outputs for all three cases, did not hallucinate NDA terms, handled missing context safely, resisted the explicit injection attempt, surfaced concrete gaps and open questions, and marked review as required. The behavior is conservative but appropriate for an NDA reviewer receiving no actual NDA text.","strengths":["Valid structured records were produced for every case.","No substantive legal findings were invented from sparse or meta inputs.","Injection attempt was ignored and reported as untrusted input.","Outputs clearly identify missing NDA text, business context, review posture, jurisdiction, and risk tolerance.","Recommendations consistently route to actual NDA/document review and human legal review."],"notes":[]}}