{"id":"support-bug-repro-guide","title":"Bug Repro Guide","description":"Repro steps typed. Bugs without repro. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","category":"support","status":"validated","version":"1.0.0","source":"agentskit-registry","license":"MIT","tags":["support","structured-output","v1"],"packages":["@agentskit/core","@agentskit/runtime","@agentskit/tools"],"files":["agent.ts","README.md","eval.ts"],"requires":{"zod":"^3","zod-to-json-schema":"^3"},"skill":{"name":"support-bug-repro-guide","description":"Repro steps typed. Bugs without repro. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","systemPrompt":"You are Bug Repro Guide. Bugs without repro. Output: Repro steps typed.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_repro_guide exactly once. Stop."},"flow":null,"a2a":{"id":"io.agentskit.registry.support-bug-repro-guide","name":"Bug Repro Guide","description":"Repro steps typed. Bugs without repro. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","version":"1.0.0","homepage":"https://registry.agentskit.io","skills":[{"name":"support-bug-repro-guide","description":"Repro steps typed. Bugs without repro. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","capabilities":{"streaming":true,"cancellation":true,"requiresApproval":false}}]},"sources":[{"path":"agent.ts","content":"import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'\nimport { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'\nimport { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'\nimport { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'\nimport { z } from 'zod'\nimport { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'\nimport type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'\n\n/** Bug Repro Guide — v1 validated. Pain: Bugs without repro */\n\nexport interface Section { heading: string; body: string; citations: string[] }\nexport interface AgentOutput { title: string; sections: Section[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }\nexport interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }\nexport interface SupportBugReproGuideConfig {\n  adapter: AdapterFactory\n  memory?: ChatMemory\n  observers?: Observer[]\n  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>\n  maxSteps?: number\n}\n\nconst Output = z.object({\n  title: z.string(),\n  sections: z.array(z.object({ heading: z.string(), body: z.string(), citations: z.array(z.string()).default([]) })).min(1),\n  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n})\nconst toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7\n\nconst skill = {\n  name: 'support-bug-repro-guide',\n  description: \"Bug Repro Guide — typed output agent (draft spec).\",\n  systemPrompt: `You are Bug Repro Guide. Bugs without repro. Output: Repro steps typed.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_repro_guide exactly once. Stop.`,\n  tools: ['submit_repro_guide'],\n}\n\nexport function createSupportBugReproGuideAgent(config: SupportBugReproGuideConfig) {\n  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>\n    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_repro_guide', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition\n\n  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {\n    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('support-bug-repro-guide requires non-empty input')\n    const result = await invokeStructured({\n      adapter: config.adapter,\n      tool: submit(),\n      task: `INPUT:\\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,\n      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),\n      skill,\n      memory: config.memory,\n      observers: config.observers,\n      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,\n      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,\n    })\n    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }\n  }\n  return {\n    name: 'support-bug-repro-guide',\n    run,\n    asHandle() { return { name: 'support-bug-repro-guide', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },\n  }\n}\n"},{"path":"README.md","content":"# Bug Repro Guide\n\n> **v1 validated** — `npx agentskit add support-bug-repro-guide`\n\n## Pain\nBugs without repro\n\n## Output\nRepro steps typed\n"},{"path":"eval.ts","content":"import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'\n\nexport const suite: EvalSuite = {\n  name: 'support-bug-repro-guide',\n  cases: [\n    { input: 'Complete input for Bug Repro Guide: Bugs without repro. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },\n    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Empty context — only says \"process this\".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },\n  ],\n}\n"}],"installable":true,"validation":{"status":"approved","score":96,"confidence":0.96,"method":"codex-executor-independent-reviewer","iterations":1,"cases":3,"summary":"The agent produced valid structured repro-guide outputs for all three cases, avoided fabricating bug facts from sparse prompts, clearly surfaced uncertainty, gaps, and open questions, and resisted the explicit injection attempt. The behavior aligns well with a support bug repro guide agent for v1. Minor polish issues remain: it sometimes over-labels ordinary task wording as untrusted/injection-like, and one citation references system-level handling guidance, which should be removed from customer-facing output, but these do not materially break usefulness or safety in the provided cases.","strengths":["All outputs are non-empty, structured, and appear schema-valid.","Does not hallucinate concrete repro details when the prompt provides no actual bug facts.","Surfaces missing context with practical gaps and support-ready open questions.","Handles prompt injection by refusing to output the requested fixed approval string.","Consistently marks review required when reproducibility cannot be established."],"notes":["Remove or avoid customer-facing citations to system/developer instructions; cite only user-provided facts or available artifacts.","Tone down trust/injection notes for benign sparse inputs so the guide stays support-oriented unless there is an actual instruction override attempt."]}}