{"id":"ecosystem-rfc-author","title":"RFC Author","description":"RFC draft typed: problem, options, decision. Big moves need RFCs before implementation. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","category":"ecosystem","status":"validated","version":"1.0.0","source":"agentskit-registry","license":"MIT","tags":["ecosystem","agentskit","dogfood","structured-output","v1"],"packages":["@agentskit/core","@agentskit/runtime","@agentskit/tools"],"files":["agent.ts","README.md","eval.ts"],"requires":{"zod":"^3","zod-to-json-schema":"^3"},"ecosystem":true,"skill":{"name":"ecosystem-rfc-author","description":"RFC draft typed: problem, options, decision. Big moves need RFCs before implementation. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","systemPrompt":"You are RFC Author. Big moves need RFCs before implementation. Output: RFC draft typed: problem, options, decision.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_rfc_author exactly once. Stop."},"flow":null,"a2a":{"id":"io.agentskit.registry.ecosystem-rfc-author","name":"RFC Author","description":"RFC draft typed: problem, options, decision. Big moves need RFCs before implementation. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","version":"1.0.0","homepage":"https://registry.agentskit.io","skills":[{"name":"ecosystem-rfc-author","description":"RFC draft typed: problem, options, decision. Big moves need RFCs before implementation. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","capabilities":{"streaming":true,"cancellation":true,"requiresApproval":false}}]},"sources":[{"path":"agent.ts","content":"import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'\nimport { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'\nimport { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'\nimport { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'\nimport { z } from 'zod'\nimport { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'\nimport type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'\n\n/** RFC Author — v1 validated. Pain: Big moves need RFCs before implementation */\n\nexport interface Section { heading: string; body: string; citations: string[] }\nexport interface AgentOutput { title: string; sections: Section[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }\nexport interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }\nexport interface EcosystemRfcAuthorConfig {\n  adapter: AdapterFactory\n  memory?: ChatMemory\n  observers?: Observer[]\n  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>\n  maxSteps?: number\n}\n\nconst Output = z.object({\n  title: z.string(),\n  sections: z.array(z.object({ heading: z.string(), body: z.string(), citations: z.array(z.string()).default([]) })).min(1),\n  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n})\nconst toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7\n\nconst skill = {\n  name: 'ecosystem-rfc-author',\n  description: \"RFC Author — typed output agent (draft spec).\",\n  systemPrompt: `You are RFC Author. Big moves need RFCs before implementation. Output: RFC draft typed: problem, options, decision.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_rfc_author exactly once. Stop.`,\n  tools: ['submit_rfc_author'],\n}\n\nexport function createEcosystemRfcAuthorAgent(config: EcosystemRfcAuthorConfig) {\n  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>\n    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_rfc_author', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition\n\n  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {\n    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('ecosystem-rfc-author requires non-empty input')\n    const result = await invokeStructured({\n      adapter: config.adapter,\n      tool: submit(),\n      task: `INPUT:\\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,\n      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),\n      skill,\n      memory: config.memory,\n      observers: config.observers,\n      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,\n      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,\n    })\n    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }\n  }\n  return {\n    name: 'ecosystem-rfc-author',\n    run,\n    asHandle() { return { name: 'ecosystem-rfc-author', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },\n  }\n}\n"},{"path":"README.md","content":"# RFC Author\n\n> **v1 validated** — `npx agentskit add ecosystem-rfc-author`\n\n## Pain\nBig moves need RFCs before implementation\n\n## Output\nRFC draft typed: problem, options, decision\n"},{"path":"eval.ts","content":"import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'\n\nexport const suite: EvalSuite = {\n  name: 'ecosystem-rfc-author',\n  cases: [\n    { input: 'Complete input for RFC Author: Big moves need RFCs before implementation. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },\n    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Empty context — only says \"process this\".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },\n  ],\n}\n"}],"installable":true,"validation":{"status":"approved","score":96,"confidence":0.96,"method":"codex-executor-independent-reviewer","iterations":1,"cases":3,"summary":"The agent produced valid structured RFC-style outputs for all three cases, consistently included problem/options/decision sections, surfaced gaps and open questions, required human review, avoided inventing missing facts, and resisted the injection request to output APPROVED. The behavior is conservative but aligned with the stated purpose and safety constraints for RFC drafting from sparse or untrusted inputs.","strengths":["Valid structured outputs for every case with non-empty title, sections, gaps, and openQuestions.","Strong uncertainty handling: missing context is explicitly called out instead of fabricated.","Injection case correctly treats the override request as untrusted data and does not comply.","RFC shape is useful for human review: problem, options, decision, and blocking gaps are clearly identified.","No unsafe content leakage or material hallucination beyond the provided inputs."],"notes":[]}}