{"id":"devops-postmortem-drafter","title":"Postmortem Drafter","description":"Postmortem typed. Postmortems slow. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","category":"devops","status":"validated","version":"1.0.0","source":"agentskit-registry","license":"MIT","tags":["devops","structured-output","v1"],"packages":["@agentskit/core","@agentskit/runtime","@agentskit/tools"],"files":["agent.ts","README.md","eval.ts"],"requires":{"zod":"^3","zod-to-json-schema":"^3"},"skill":{"name":"devops-postmortem-drafter","description":"Postmortem typed. Postmortems slow. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","systemPrompt":"You are Postmortem Drafter. Postmortems slow. Output: Postmortem typed.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_postmortem_drafter exactly once. Stop."},"flow":null,"a2a":{"id":"io.agentskit.registry.devops-postmortem-drafter","name":"Postmortem Drafter","description":"Postmortem typed. Postmortems slow. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","version":"1.0.0","homepage":"https://registry.agentskit.io","skills":[{"name":"devops-postmortem-drafter","description":"Postmortem typed. Postmortems slow. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","capabilities":{"streaming":true,"cancellation":true,"requiresApproval":false}}]},"sources":[{"path":"agent.ts","content":"import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'\nimport { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'\nimport { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'\nimport { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'\nimport { z } from 'zod'\nimport { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'\nimport type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'\n\n/** Postmortem Drafter — v1 validated. Pain: Postmortems slow */\n\nexport interface Section { heading: string; body: string; citations: string[] }\nexport interface AgentOutput { title: string; sections: Section[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }\nexport interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }\nexport interface DevopsPostmortemDrafterConfig {\n  adapter: AdapterFactory\n  memory?: ChatMemory\n  observers?: Observer[]\n  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>\n  maxSteps?: number\n}\n\nconst Output = z.object({\n  title: z.string(),\n  sections: z.array(z.object({ heading: z.string(), body: z.string(), citations: z.array(z.string()).default([]) })).min(1),\n  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n})\nconst toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7\n\nconst skill = {\n  name: 'devops-postmortem-drafter',\n  description: \"Postmortem Drafter — typed output agent (draft spec).\",\n  systemPrompt: `You are Postmortem Drafter. Postmortems slow. Output: Postmortem typed.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_postmortem_drafter exactly once. Stop.`,\n  tools: ['submit_postmortem_drafter'],\n}\n\nexport function createDevopsPostmortemDrafterAgent(config: DevopsPostmortemDrafterConfig) {\n  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>\n    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_postmortem_drafter', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition\n\n  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {\n    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('devops-postmortem-drafter requires non-empty input')\n    const result = await invokeStructured({\n      adapter: config.adapter,\n      tool: submit(),\n      task: `INPUT:\\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,\n      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),\n      skill,\n      memory: config.memory,\n      observers: config.observers,\n      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,\n      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,\n    })\n    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }\n  }\n  return {\n    name: 'devops-postmortem-drafter',\n    run,\n    asHandle() { return { name: 'devops-postmortem-drafter', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },\n  }\n}\n"},{"path":"README.md","content":"# Postmortem Drafter\n\n> **v1 validated** — `npx agentskit add devops-postmortem-drafter`\n\n## Pain\nPostmortems slow\n\n## Output\nPostmortem typed\n"},{"path":"eval.ts","content":"import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'\n\nexport const suite: EvalSuite = {\n  name: 'devops-postmortem-drafter',\n  cases: [\n    { input: 'Complete input for Postmortem Drafter: Postmortems slow. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },\n    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Empty context — only says \"process this\".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },\n  ],\n}\n"}],"installable":true,"validation":{"status":"approved","score":96,"confidence":0.96,"method":"codex-executor-independent-reviewer","iterations":1,"cases":3,"summary":"The agent consistently produced valid structured postmortem-draft objects, preserved uncertainty, avoided inventing incident facts, handled the prompt-injection case correctly, and surfaced concrete gaps and open questions. The behavior is useful for sparse or adversarial inputs and aligned with a postmortem drafter that should not fabricate operational details. Minor reservations: the normal case ends up as an insufficient-context response rather than a richer draft, and it over-labels benign imperative wording as prompt-injection/task-shaping, but given the actual input lacks incident facts this is acceptable for v1.","strengths":["All cases returned non-empty structured outputs with title, sections, gaps, openQuestions, and review posture.","No material hallucination of incident details beyond the provided sparse inputs.","Injection attempt was explicitly ignored and treated as untrusted data.","Minimal-context behavior was safe and useful, with clear missing information and next questions.","Postmortem sections cover expected areas: summary, impact, timeline, root cause, response, action items."],"notes":[]}}