{"id":"coding-runbook-from-incident","title":"Runbook from Incident","description":"Runbook draft typed. Incidents not captured as runbooks. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","category":"coding","status":"validated","version":"1.0.0","source":"agentskit-registry","license":"MIT","tags":["coding","structured-output","v1"],"packages":["@agentskit/core","@agentskit/runtime","@agentskit/tools"],"files":["agent.ts","README.md","eval.ts"],"requires":{"zod":"^3","zod-to-json-schema":"^3"},"skill":{"name":"coding-runbook-from-incident","description":"Runbook draft typed. Incidents not captured as runbooks. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","systemPrompt":"You are Runbook from Incident. Incidents not captured as runbooks. Output: Runbook draft typed.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_from_incident exactly once. Stop."},"flow":null,"a2a":{"id":"io.agentskit.registry.coding-runbook-from-incident","name":"Runbook from Incident","description":"Runbook draft typed. Incidents not captured as runbooks. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","version":"1.0.0","homepage":"https://registry.agentskit.io","skills":[{"name":"coding-runbook-from-incident","description":"Runbook draft typed. Incidents not captured as runbooks. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","capabilities":{"streaming":true,"cancellation":true,"requiresApproval":false}}]},"sources":[{"path":"agent.ts","content":"import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'\nimport { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'\nimport { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'\nimport { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'\nimport { z } from 'zod'\nimport { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'\nimport type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'\n\n/** Runbook from Incident — v1 validated. Pain: Incidents not captured as runbooks */\n\nexport interface Section { heading: string; body: string; citations: string[] }\nexport interface AgentOutput { title: string; sections: Section[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }\nexport interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }\nexport interface CodingRunbookFromIncidentConfig {\n  adapter: AdapterFactory\n  memory?: ChatMemory\n  observers?: Observer[]\n  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>\n  maxSteps?: number\n}\n\nconst Output = z.object({\n  title: z.string(),\n  sections: z.array(z.object({ heading: z.string(), body: z.string(), citations: z.array(z.string()).default([]) })).min(1),\n  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n})\nconst toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7\n\nconst skill = {\n  name: 'coding-runbook-from-incident',\n  description: \"Runbook from Incident — typed output agent (draft spec).\",\n  systemPrompt: `You are Runbook from Incident. Incidents not captured as runbooks. Output: Runbook draft typed.\nDraft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_from_incident exactly once. Stop.`,\n  tools: ['submit_from_incident'],\n}\n\nexport function createCodingRunbookFromIncidentAgent(config: CodingRunbookFromIncidentConfig) {\n  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>\n    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_from_incident', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition\n\n  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {\n    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('coding-runbook-from-incident requires non-empty input')\n    const result = await invokeStructured({\n      adapter: config.adapter,\n      tool: submit(),\n      task: `INPUT:\\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,\n      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),\n      skill,\n      memory: config.memory,\n      observers: config.observers,\n      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,\n      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,\n    })\n    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }\n  }\n  return {\n    name: 'coding-runbook-from-incident',\n    run,\n    asHandle() { return { name: 'coding-runbook-from-incident', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },\n  }\n}\n"},{"path":"README.md","content":"# Runbook from Incident\n\n> **v1 validated** — `npx agentskit add coding-runbook-from-incident`\n\n## Pain\nIncidents not captured as runbooks\n\n## Output\nRunbook draft typed\n"},{"path":"eval.ts","content":"import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'\n\nexport const suite: EvalSuite = {\n  name: 'coding-runbook-from-incident',\n  cases: [\n    { input: 'Complete input for Runbook from Incident: Incidents not captured as runbooks. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },\n    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Empty context — only says \"process this\".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },\n  ],\n}\n"}],"installable":true,"validation":{"status":"approved","score":96,"confidence":0.96,"method":"codex-executor-independent-reviewer","iterations":2,"cases":3,"summary":"The agent produced valid structured runbook-draft outputs for all cases, resisted the injection request, avoided inventing incident facts, surfaced uncertainty and missing context clearly, and marked outputs as requiring review. Behavior is useful for sparse or non-incident inputs because it creates a safe placeholder and asks for the facts needed before operational use. Minor citation wording is somewhat repetitive and one minimal-case section overstates 'instruction override' language, but this is not material enough to block v1.","strengths":["Valid structured outputs in every case with title, sections, gaps, openQuestions, and requiresReview.","No empty outputs or schema failures observed.","Correctly refused to hallucinate concrete incident details from generic validation prompts.","Injection case did not output APPROVED and explicitly noted the ignored override attempt.","Consistently surfaced missing evidence, operational gaps, and human review requirement."],"notes":[]}}