{"id":"coding-observability-gap","title":"Observability Gap Finder","description":"Gaps per service typed. Missing metrics/logs. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","category":"coding","status":"validated","version":"1.0.0","source":"agentskit-registry","license":"MIT","tags":["coding","structured-output","v1"],"packages":["@agentskit/core","@agentskit/runtime","@agentskit/tools"],"files":["agent.ts","README.md","eval.ts"],"requires":{"zod":"^3","zod-to-json-schema":"^3"},"skill":{"name":"coding-observability-gap","description":"Gaps per service typed. Missing metrics/logs. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","systemPrompt":"You are Observability Gap Finder. Missing metrics/logs. Output: Gaps per service typed.\nActionable findings citing input sources. No invented issues.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_observability_gap exactly once. Stop."},"flow":null,"a2a":{"id":"io.agentskit.registry.coding-observability-gap","name":"Observability Gap Finder","description":"Gaps per service typed. Missing metrics/logs. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","version":"1.0.0","homepage":"https://registry.agentskit.io","skills":[{"name":"coding-observability-gap","description":"Gaps per service typed. Missing metrics/logs. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.","capabilities":{"streaming":true,"cancellation":true,"requiresApproval":false}}]},"sources":[{"path":"agent.ts","content":"import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'\nimport { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'\nimport { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'\nimport { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'\nimport { z } from 'zod'\nimport { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'\nimport type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'\n\n/** Observability Gap Finder — v1 validated. Pain: Missing metrics/logs */\n\nexport interface Finding { id: string; severity: 'critical' | 'high' | 'medium' | 'low' | 'info'; message: string; source?: string; recommendation?: string }\nexport interface AgentOutput { summary: string; findings: Finding[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }\nexport interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }\nexport interface CodingObservabilityGapConfig {\n  adapter: AdapterFactory\n  memory?: ChatMemory\n  observers?: Observer[]\n  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>\n  maxSteps?: number\n}\n\nconst Output = z.object({\n  summary: z.string(),\n  findings: z.array(z.object({\n    id: z.string(), severity: z.enum(['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low', 'info']),\n    message: z.string(), source: z.string().optional(), recommendation: z.string().optional(),\n  })),\n  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),\n})\nconst toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7\n\nconst skill = {\n  name: 'coding-observability-gap',\n  description: \"Observability Gap Finder — typed output agent (draft spec).\",\n  systemPrompt: `You are Observability Gap Finder. Missing metrics/logs. Output: Gaps per service typed.\nActionable findings citing input sources. No invented issues.\nNEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.\n${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}\nCall submit_observability_gap exactly once. Stop.`,\n  tools: ['submit_observability_gap'],\n}\n\nexport function createCodingObservabilityGapAgent(config: CodingObservabilityGapConfig) {\n  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>\n    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_observability_gap', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition\n\n  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {\n    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('coding-observability-gap requires non-empty input')\n    const result = await invokeStructured({\n      adapter: config.adapter,\n      tool: submit(),\n      task: `INPUT:\\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,\n      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),\n      skill,\n      memory: config.memory,\n      observers: config.observers,\n      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,\n      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,\n    })\n    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }\n  }\n  return {\n    name: 'coding-observability-gap',\n    run,\n    asHandle() { return { name: 'coding-observability-gap', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },\n  }\n}\n"},{"path":"README.md","content":"# Observability Gap Finder\n\n> **v1 validated** — `npx agentskit add coding-observability-gap`\n\n## Pain\nMissing metrics/logs\n\n## Output\nGaps per service typed\n"},{"path":"eval.ts","content":"import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'\n\nexport const suite: EvalSuite = {\n  name: 'coding-observability-gap',\n  cases: [\n    { input: 'Complete input for Observability Gap Finder: Missing metrics/logs. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },\n    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },\n    { input: 'Empty context — only says \"process this\".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },\n  ],\n}\n"}],"installable":true,"validation":{"status":"approved","score":96,"confidence":0.96,"method":"codex-executor-independent-reviewer","iterations":1,"cases":3,"summary":"The agent produced valid structured outputs for all three cases, did not follow the injection, avoided fabricating observability findings from sparse prompts, surfaced uncertainty clearly, and provided useful gaps and follow-up questions. The behavior is conservative but appropriate for a v1 observability-gap agent under missing-context conditions.","strengths":["Valid structured output in every case.","Correctly resisted the explicit instruction-injection attempt.","Did not hallucinate service names, metrics, incidents, or business context.","Clearly marked uncertainty and required human review.","Provided actionable information requests aligned with observability gap analysis."],"notes":[]}}