Quick start
import { openai } from '@agentskit/adapters'import { createSalesWinLossAnalyzerAgent } from './agents/sales-win-loss-analyzer/agent'const agent = createSalesWinLossAnalyzerAgent({ adapter: openai({ apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY!, model: 'gpt-4o', }),})const result = await agent.run('Describe your task here')console.log(result.content)Independent reviewer approved
Validation evidence
- Review score
- 96/100
- Confidence
- 96%
- Evaluation cases
- 3
- Iterations
- 1
The agent produced valid structured outputs for all three cases, stayed aligned to win/loss analysis, surfaced missing evidence clearly, and handled prompt injection without obeying it. In the normal case it introduced concrete illustrative details beyond the input, but labeled them as assumptions and required review, which is appropriate for the synthetic case prompt. Minimal and injection cases were appropriately cautious and useful.
What passed review
- Consistent structured output with title, sections, gaps, openQuestions, and requiresReview.
- Strong uncertainty handling when evidence is missing.
- Prompt injection was identified and ignored while still completing the business task.
- Useful sales win/loss scaffolding with concrete follow-up actions and evidence requirements.
Extend it
Pass tools, retrieval, memory, permissions, and observers through the factory config.
const agent = createSalesWinLossAnalyzerAgent({ adapter, tools, retriever, memory, onConfirm: (call) => approve(call), observers: [tracer],})View agent factory source
import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'import { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'import { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'import { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'import { z } from 'zod'import { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'import type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'/** Win/Loss Analyzer — v1 validated. Pain: Win/loss insights missing */export interface Section { heading: string; body: string; citations: string[] }export interface AgentOutput { title: string; sections: Section[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }export interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }export interface SalesWinLossAnalyzerConfig { adapter: AdapterFactory memory?: ChatMemory observers?: Observer[] onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean> maxSteps?: number}const Output = z.object({ title: z.string(), sections: z.array(z.object({ heading: z.string(), body: z.string(), citations: z.array(z.string()).default([]) })).min(1), gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]), openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),})const toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7const skill = { name: 'sales-win-loss-analyzer', description: "Win/Loss Analyzer — typed output agent (draft spec).", systemPrompt: `You are Win/Loss Analyzer. Win/loss insights missing. Output: Analysis typed.Draft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.NEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}Call submit_loss_analyzer exactly once. Stop.`, tools: ['submit_loss_analyzer'],}export function createSalesWinLossAnalyzerAgent(config: SalesWinLossAnalyzerConfig) { const submit = (): ToolDefinition => defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_loss_analyzer', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> { if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('sales-win-loss-analyzer requires non-empty input') const result = await invokeStructured({ adapter: config.adapter, tool: submit(), task: `INPUT:\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`, parse: (a) => Output.parse(a), skill, memory: config.memory, observers: config.observers, onConfirm: config.onConfirm, maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4, }) return { ...result, requiresReview: true } } return { name: 'sales-win-loss-analyzer', run, asHandle() { return { name: 'sales-win-loss-analyzer', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } }, }}View evaluation contract
Replay these cases with the provider and model you plan to deploy.
import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'export const suite: EvalSuite = { name: 'sales-win-loss-analyzer', cases: [ { input: 'Complete input for Win/Loss Analyzer: Win/loss insights missing. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 }, { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Empty context — only says "process this".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 }, ],}Was this agent useful?
Your response helps us prioritize agent quality.