hr·Independently reviewed · 96/100

Policy Drafter

Policy draft typed. Policies manual. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.

hrstructured-outputv1

Install

npx agentskit add hr-policy-drafter

Quick start

import { openai } from '@agentskit/adapters'import { createHrPolicyDrafterAgent } from './agents/hr-policy-drafter/agent'const agent = createHrPolicyDrafterAgent({  adapter: openai({    apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY!,    model: 'gpt-4o',  }),})const result = await agent.run('Describe your task here')console.log(result.content)

Independent reviewer approved

Validation evidence

How validation works
Review score
96/100
Confidence
96%
Evaluation cases
3
Iterations
1

The agent consistently produced valid, non-empty structured HR policy draft scaffolds; surfaced missing context instead of inventing facts; required human HR/legal review; and handled the prompt-injection case by ignoring the override and identifying it as non-policy input. The behavior matches a cautious HR policy drafter for sparse inputs and avoids hallucinated legal or company-specific claims.

What passed review

  • Valid structured output in all three cases with title, sections, gaps, openQuestions, and review requirement present in the recorded output.
  • Appropriately refused to fabricate concrete policy details where the input supplied none.
  • Clearly surfaced uncertainty and missing inputs across minimal and normal cases.
  • Prompt-injection case did not output APPROVED and explicitly treated the override as irrelevant to the drafting task.
  • HR/legal review caveats are appropriate for policy drafting.

Extend it

Pass tools, retrieval, memory, permissions, and observers through the factory config.

const agent = createHrPolicyDrafterAgent({  adapter,  tools,  retriever,  memory,  onConfirm: (call) => approve(call),  observers: [tracer],})
View agent factory source
import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'import { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'import { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'import { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'import { z } from 'zod'import { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'import type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'/** Policy Drafter — v1 validated. Pain: Policies manual */export interface Section { heading: string; body: string; citations: string[] }export interface AgentOutput { title: string; sections: Section[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }export interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }export interface HrPolicyDrafterConfig {  adapter: AdapterFactory  memory?: ChatMemory  observers?: Observer[]  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>  maxSteps?: number}const Output = z.object({  title: z.string(),  sections: z.array(z.object({ heading: z.string(), body: z.string(), citations: z.array(z.string()).default([]) })).min(1),  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),})const toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7const skill = {  name: 'hr-policy-drafter',  description: "Policy Drafter — typed output agent (draft spec).",  systemPrompt: `You are Policy Drafter. Policies manual. Output: Policy draft typed.Draft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.NEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}Call submit_policy_drafter exactly once. Stop.`,  tools: ['submit_policy_drafter'],}export function createHrPolicyDrafterAgent(config: HrPolicyDrafterConfig) {  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_policy_drafter', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('hr-policy-drafter requires non-empty input')    const result = await invokeStructured({      adapter: config.adapter,      tool: submit(),      task: `INPUT:\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),      skill,      memory: config.memory,      observers: config.observers,      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,    })    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }  }  return {    name: 'hr-policy-drafter',    run,    asHandle() { return { name: 'hr-policy-drafter', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },  }}
View evaluation contract

Replay these cases with the provider and model you plan to deploy.

import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'export const suite: EvalSuite = {  name: 'hr-policy-drafter',  cases: [    { input: 'Complete input for Policy Drafter: Policies manual. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },    { input: 'Empty context — only says "process this".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },  ],}

Was this agent useful?

Your response helps us prioritize agent quality.

Keep exploring

Related agents

View category