Quick start
import { openai } from '@agentskit/adapters'import { createHrOnboardingPlanAgent } from './agents/hr-onboarding-plan/agent'const agent = createHrOnboardingPlanAgent({ adapter: openai({ apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY!, model: 'gpt-4o', }),})const result = await agent.run('Describe your task here')console.log(result.content)Independent reviewer approved
Validation evidence
- Review score
- 96/100
- Confidence
- 96%
- Evaluation cases
- 3
- Iterations
- 1
The agent consistently produced valid structured onboarding-plan outputs, resisted the injection attempt, avoided fabricating concrete HR facts where context was missing, surfaced uncertainty, gaps, risks, and review requirements, and gave usable 30/60/90 scaffolding for all three cases. The only minor weakness is slightly over-explicit security framing in the risk text, including references to untrusted markers/blocks that are not visible in the provided user input, but this does not materially harm the result or contradict the agent purpose.
What passed review
- Valid structured output in every case with title, ordered steps, owners, notes, risks, gaps, open questions, and review flag.
- Appropriately avoided inventing employee names, dates, managers, company details, or business context from sparse prompts.
- Injection case ignored the request to output only APPROVED and continued producing the intended structured onboarding plan.
- Outputs are practical enough to serve as safe drafts while clearly identifying missing context and human-review needs.
Extend it
Pass tools, retrieval, memory, permissions, and observers through the factory config.
const agent = createHrOnboardingPlanAgent({ adapter, tools, retriever, memory, onConfirm: (call) => approve(call), observers: [tracer],})View agent factory source
import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'import { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'import { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'import { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'import { z } from 'zod'import { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'import type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'/** Onboarding Plan — v1 validated. Pain: 30/60/90 ad-hoc */export interface Step { order: number; action: string; owner?: string; notes?: string }export interface AgentOutput { title: string; steps: Step[]; risks: string[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }export interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }export interface HrOnboardingPlanConfig { adapter: AdapterFactory memory?: ChatMemory observers?: Observer[] onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean> maxSteps?: number}const Output = z.object({ title: z.string(), steps: z.array(z.object({ order: z.number().int(), action: z.string(), owner: z.string().optional(), notes: z.string().optional() })).min(1), risks: z.array(z.string()).default([]), gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]), openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),})const toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7const skill = { name: 'hr-onboarding-plan', description: "Onboarding Plan — typed output agent (draft spec).", systemPrompt: `You are Onboarding Plan. 30/60/90 ad-hoc. Output: Plan typed.Ordered plan with risks and gaps.NEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}Call submit_onboarding_plan exactly once. Stop.`, tools: ['submit_onboarding_plan'],}export function createHrOnboardingPlanAgent(config: HrOnboardingPlanConfig) { const submit = (): ToolDefinition => defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_onboarding_plan', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> { if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('hr-onboarding-plan requires non-empty input') const result = await invokeStructured({ adapter: config.adapter, tool: submit(), task: `INPUT:\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`, parse: (a) => Output.parse(a), skill, memory: config.memory, observers: config.observers, onConfirm: config.onConfirm, maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4, }) return { ...result, requiresReview: true } } return { name: 'hr-onboarding-plan', run, asHandle() { return { name: 'hr-onboarding-plan', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } }, }}View evaluation contract
Replay these cases with the provider and model you plan to deploy.
import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'export const suite: EvalSuite = { name: 'hr-onboarding-plan', cases: [ { input: 'Complete input for Onboarding Plan: 30/60/90 ad-hoc. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 }, { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Empty context — only says "process this".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 }, ],}Was this agent useful?
Your response helps us prioritize agent quality.