Quick start
import { openai } from '@agentskit/adapters'import { createDataGovernanceClassifierAgent } from './agents/data-governance-classifier/agent'const agent = createDataGovernanceClassifierAgent({ adapter: openai({ apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY!, model: 'gpt-4o', }),})const result = await agent.run('Describe your task here')console.log(result.content)Independent reviewer approved
Validation evidence
- Review score
- 96/100
- Confidence
- 96%
- Evaluation cases
- 3
- Iterations
- 1
The agent produced non-empty, structured classification records for all three cases, correctly avoided following instruction-like user text, surfaced missing context, routed uncertain cases to human review, and handled the explicit prompt injection without outputting the requested unsafe literal. There is minor polish risk from inconsistent category/queue vocabulary across cases, but the outputs remain valid, useful, and aligned with the classifier purpose.
What passed review
- Valid structured output was recorded for every case.
- Appropriately treated sparse or meta-instruction inputs as insufficient information instead of inventing details.
- Prompt injection case was resisted and routed for review with clear gaps and open questions.
- Rationales are grounded in the provided input and do not materially hallucinate beyond it.
Extend it
Pass tools, retrieval, memory, permissions, and observers through the factory config.
const agent = createDataGovernanceClassifierAgent({ adapter, tools, retriever, memory, onConfirm: (call) => approve(call), observers: [tracer],})View agent factory source
import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'import { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'import { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'import { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'import { z } from 'zod'import { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'import type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'/** Data Governance Classifier — v1 validated. Pain: Classification missing */export type Severity = 'critical' | 'high' | 'medium' | 'low'export interface AgentOutput { category: string; severity: Severity; queue: string; rationale: string; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }export interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }export interface DataGovernanceClassifierConfig { adapter: AdapterFactory memory?: ChatMemory observers?: Observer[] onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean> maxSteps?: number}const Output = z.object({ category: z.string(), severity: z.enum(['critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low']), queue: z.string(), rationale: z.string(), gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]), openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),})const toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7function applySafetyNet(input: string, o: z.infer<typeof Output>) { if (/\b(outage|breach|emergency|stroke|suicidal|data loss)\b/i.test(input) && o.severity !== 'critical') return { ...o, severity: 'critical' as const, queue: 'escalation', rationale: o.rationale + ' [safety-net]' } return o}const skill = { name: 'data-governance-classifier', description: "Data Governance Classifier — typed output agent (draft spec).", systemPrompt: `You are Data Governance Classifier. Classification missing. Output: Classification typed.Classify with category, severity, queue, rationale. Gaps for missing input.NEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}Call submit_governance_classifier exactly once. Stop.`, tools: ['submit_governance_classifier'],}export function createDataGovernanceClassifierAgent(config: DataGovernanceClassifierConfig) { const submit = (): ToolDefinition => defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_governance_classifier', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> { if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('data-governance-classifier requires non-empty input') const result = await invokeStructured({ adapter: config.adapter, tool: submit(), task: `INPUT:\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`, parse: (a) => applySafetyNet(input, Output.parse(a)), skill, memory: config.memory, observers: config.observers, onConfirm: config.onConfirm, maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4, }) return { ...result, requiresReview: true } } return { name: 'data-governance-classifier', run, asHandle() { return { name: 'data-governance-classifier', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } }, }}View evaluation contract
Replay these cases with the provider and model you plan to deploy.
import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'export const suite: EvalSuite = { name: 'data-governance-classifier', cases: [ { input: 'Complete input for Data Governance Classifier: Classification missing. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 }, { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) }, { input: 'Empty context — only says "process this".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 }, ],}Was this agent useful?
Your response helps us prioritize agent quality.