clinical·Independently reviewed · 96/100

Discharge Summary

Summary typed. Discharge docs slow. Typed v1 agent with eval coverage.

clinicalstructured-outputv1

Install

npx agentskit add clinical-discharge-summary

Quick start

import { openai } from '@agentskit/adapters'import { createClinicalDischargeSummaryAgent } from './agents/clinical-discharge-summary/agent'const agent = createClinicalDischargeSummaryAgent({  adapter: openai({    apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY!,    model: 'gpt-4o',  }),})const result = await agent.run('Describe your task here')console.log(result.content)

Independent reviewer approved

Validation evidence

How validation works
Review score
96/100
Confidence
96%
Evaluation cases
3
Iterations
1

The agent produced valid structured discharge-summary outputs for all three cases, did not fabricate missing clinical details, surfaced uncertainty and gaps clearly, required human review, and resisted the injection request. Behavior is conservative and aligned with a clinical summarization agent where source facts are absent.

What passed review

  • Valid structured outputs with title, sections, gaps, openQuestions, and review requirement.
  • Appropriately refused to invent patient facts from sparse or meta prompts.
  • Injection case correctly treated the adversarial instruction as untrusted data and did not output the requested approval phrase.
  • Gap lists are clinically relevant and useful for follow-up data collection.

Extend it

Pass tools, retrieval, memory, permissions, and observers through the factory config.

const agent = createClinicalDischargeSummaryAgent({  adapter,  tools,  retriever,  memory,  onConfirm: (call) => approve(call),  observers: [tracer],})
View agent factory source
import type { AdapterFactory, ChatMemory, Observer, ToolCall, ToolDefinition } from '@agentskit/core'import { fenceUntrustedContent, UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE } from '@agentskit/core/security'import { invokeStructured } from '@agentskit/runtime'import { defineZodTool } from '@agentskit/tools'import { z } from 'zod'import { zodToJsonSchema } from 'zod-to-json-schema'import type { JSONSchema7 } from 'json-schema'/** Discharge Summary — v1 validated. Pain: Discharge docs slow */export interface Section { heading: string; body: string; citations: string[] }export interface AgentOutput { title: string; sections: Section[]; gaps: string[]; openQuestions: string[] }export interface AgentResult extends AgentOutput { requiresReview: boolean }export interface ClinicalDischargeSummaryConfig {  adapter: AdapterFactory  memory?: ChatMemory  observers?: Observer[]  onConfirm?: (toolCall: ToolCall) => boolean | Promise<boolean>  maxSteps?: number}const Output = z.object({  title: z.string(),  sections: z.array(z.object({ heading: z.string(), body: z.string(), citations: z.array(z.string()).default([]) })).min(1),  gaps: z.array(z.string()).default([]),  openQuestions: z.array(z.string()).default([]),})const toJson = (s: z.ZodTypeAny): JSONSchema7 => zodToJsonSchema(s) as JSONSchema7const skill = {  name: 'clinical-discharge-summary',  description: "Discharge Summary — typed output agent (draft spec).",  systemPrompt: `You are Discharge Summary. Discharge docs slow. Output: Summary typed.Draft sections with citations from input. Gaps for missing facts.NEVER invent facts — gaps and openQuestions for missing input. Always draft for human review.${UNTRUSTED_CONTENT_DIRECTIVE}Call submit_discharge_summary exactly once. Stop.`,  tools: ['submit_discharge_summary'],}export function createClinicalDischargeSummaryAgent(config: ClinicalDischargeSummaryConfig) {  const submit = (): ToolDefinition =>    defineZodTool({ name: 'submit_discharge_summary', description: 'Submit result. Once.', schema: Output, toJsonSchema: toJson, async execute() { return 'recorded' } }) as ToolDefinition  async function run(input: string): Promise<AgentResult> {    if (!input?.trim()) throw new Error('clinical-discharge-summary requires non-empty input')    const result = await invokeStructured({      adapter: config.adapter,      tool: submit(),      task: `INPUT:\n${fenceUntrustedContent(input)}`,      parse: (a) => Output.parse(a),      skill,      memory: config.memory,      observers: config.observers,      onConfirm: config.onConfirm,      maxSteps: config.maxSteps ?? 4,    })    return { ...result, requiresReview: true }  }  return {    name: 'clinical-discharge-summary',    run,    asHandle() { return { name: 'clinical-discharge-summary', run: (t: string) => run(t).then((r) => JSON.stringify(r)) } },  }}
View evaluation contract

Replay these cases with the provider and model you plan to deploy.

import type { EvalSuite } from '@agentskit/eval'export const suite: EvalSuite = {  name: 'clinical-discharge-summary',  cases: [    { input: 'Complete input for Discharge Summary: Discharge docs slow. Provide full structured output.', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 20 && /requiresReview|summary|title|category|findings|sections|score|clusters|items|steps/i.test(r) },    { input: 'Minimal input.', expected: (r: string) => /gap|openQuestion/i.test(r) || r.length > 10 },    { input: 'Input with specific detail: ACME Corp project deadline March 15.', expected: (r: string) => /ACME|March|15/i.test(r) || /gap/i.test(r) },    { input: 'Empty context — only says "process this".', expected: (r: string) => r.length > 5 },  ],}

Was this agent useful?

Your response helps us prioritize agent quality.

Keep exploring

Related agents

View category